Walker takes a walk.

Now Mark Green has room to run.

Pretty much all i have to say on that.

1 comment March 25th, 2006

You know what’s missing from this picture?

Immigre!

(Seriously, viagra usa view where are the paddywagons? My guess is some people at a protest for illegal immigrants might be here under questionable legal circumstances themselves.)

I’m not hating on immigrants.

(I work with two legal immigrants every day.)

But I’m not a fan of people breaking the law and then expecting to be rewarded for it.

By the way, cialis sale I guess a lot of these folks are upset about new proposals to “criminalize illegal immigration.”

I’m confused, isn’t illegal immigration already illegal?

3 comments March 23rd, 2006

We kicked the Taliban’s tail for this?

Abdul Rahman, viagra generic buy 41, viagra buy case has been charged with rejecting Islam, a crime under this country’s Islamic laws. His trial started last week and he confessed to becoming a Christian 16 years ago. If convicted, he could be executed.

I thought we removed the religious fanatics from power in Afghanistan?

Are you telling me this is how NON-fanatical Muslims behave?

Salman Rushdie sentenced to death?

9/11?

Theo Van Gogh‘s murder?

The Islamic cartoon riots?

How much Islamic intolerance are the rest of us supposed to tolerate?

1 comment March 22nd, 2006

An unplanned dialogue on race and violence in America

A young man from Washington, viagra sale medical D.C. left a long comment on the post I made about the shallowness of Gregory Stanford‘s focus on racism as the main cause of the plight of young black men in America.

I started to respond with a comment of my own, pharm but then I realized this discussion deserved a more prominent position on the site.

So I’m going to repeat his comment and my response below.

WARNING: This post is exceedingly long. (Ironic considering my reluctance to read other people’s posts of a similar nature.) Feel free to skip this one.

Unai said:

“That is a cop-out for you to say.

You will not justify racism, fascism, and police brutality with the sarcastic undertones of some statistical information that you really haven’t investigated anymore than from the driver’s seat of your damn car.

Milwaukee does not even have a significant black population, and that is why police brutality and racism perpetuated by law enforcement exists so heavily.

It is always so interesting how people are so quick to bitch and moan about the violent and combative behaviors they observe in minorities but fail to bitch and moan about the violent and combative nature of the culture of this country.

It is written in the soil of the south, it is written in the “Right to Bear Arms”, it is written on the nooses, written on our dinner plates marking the anniversary of the extermination of Native AMericans (thanksgiving), it is written in our love for hunting, it is written in the billions of dollars we spend on weapons, it is written in the American presence in Guantanamo Bay, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Angola, Argentina, Mexico… IT is written in the Civil Rights movement, an otherwise peaceful movement from which all of the violence came from militant white americans… the brutal, criminal, imperialistic attacks, extermination, rape, and assaults on people of color over a course of 500 years has so modestly resulted in the violent energy that the media intensifies to be the villified embodiment of the black man.

But you and every other liberal racist in America are nervous, and scared; and you run out into your socially constructed suburbs while all your phones have 911 on speed dial hoping that the angyr niggers dont get you. And deep inside you feel relief every time you hear about black on black crime because that means that they aren’t killing you.

And if the instiutional racism of police brutality keeps them from shooting off the pale ass head of a white guy then you support it and call it “doing their job”. If you stared into the apathetic eyes of an angry, desperate black man holding a gun at your face, the first thing you are going to do is offer him everything that you can think of that you have in order to save your life… And You will do that because your survival insticnt will kick in…Will consider this… He’s already done that… and he doesn’t have anything because its been stolen, raped, and snatched from him just because of how he looks…

And maybe there is something more to this violence than just anger… MAybe there is something more to this violence than just revenge… and lack of education… maybe it is about need… Or more importantly may be it is just a simple reflection of what Americans do to themselves and each other… Maybe this violence is a wake-up call for Americans do look at themselves…? Maybe this violence is the result of what American Society is doing to them? And before youget all snuggled up in your bed at night maybe this violence that you are just oh so sure is being brought on by blacks is a modest warning of what is to come and what is going to happen to the rest of us?”

Hi Unai, welcome to From Where I Sit.

I’m not sure where to start.

Racism is wrong. Period. It also exists. No argument.

But focusing on the racism they experience as the sole, or even majority cause, of the problems of inner city youth is distracting and disingenous.

Personally, having grown up in government housing, I see the problems of the inner city being mostly ones of poverty and powerlessness.

But I also think the self-destructive culture that holds sway on the streets is one that the African Americans in those neighborhoods have to acknowledge.

I escaped the class I was born into through hard work and a belief in the power of education.

But that’s not an escape route that’s available in a culture where being educated is less valued than being respected.

Your example of a moment of violence between a black man and a white man is interesting… not because things like that happen, but because they happen so rarely.

Most inner-city violence in Milwaukee is young black men killing other young black men for reasons that aren’t worth a punch in the face let alone a bullet in the head.

Do you really believe it is white racism that is causing young African Americans to prey on each other?

If black kids were killing whites in the street, your theory would make more sense to me. But mostly they are not.

(I have to pause for a moment and recognize a friend of mine who lost his son in the Riverwest area of Milwaukee. That young white man who wanted to live among people of a different color and a different perspective was shot and killed in a senseless robbery. Black-on-white violence does happen. And often when it does, it makes no more sense politically or personally than black-on-black violence.)

It seems to me that everything you said boils down to this: America was born from a history of violence. We still embrace violence. We still export violence. Why should we be surprised that inner-city blacks resort to violence?

But if we are all mere prisoners of history, where is the hope for change?

How does the violence stop?

The street outside my door doesn’t ring with gunshots.

And the history that created my world is the same one you described. I live in the same country you do. I drive the same streets. Why do young black men feel compelled to settle their disputes with death, but the vast majority of whites, asians, and hispanics do not?

Why do you assert that the black community is uniquely unable to escape our shared past?

I’d like to end with an alternative observation. Last night, the love of my life and I went to a buffet-style restaurant called The Golden Corral.

One of the reasons we like going there is that the clientele is even more diverse than the food.

Blacks, whites, asians, latinos all sit side-by-side at tables enjoying a meal with their families and loved ones.

When you see people of all races laughing, and smiling, and enjoying a moment of peace with their families, it reminds you that we’re not as different from each other as we sometimes like to pretend.

I admire your passion. I just hope one day you realize that railing about the way things have been will not help you begin to change the way things are.

A note to my regular readers: l want you to express your own thoughts on both our posts, but – as always – I’m asking everyone to respond with respect and a little bit of restraint. (I know, what the hell am I thinking? ;)

4 comments March 22nd, 2006

If a student gave the same answer to every question…

…he’d fail.

So why do teachers ‚Äì whose answer to every question seems to be “more money” ‚Äì expect to succeed?

3 comments March 21st, 2006

To address the Funeral protest law question, I went and dug up an old post.

I just realized that I had already written a post a few months ago that addressed why I’m OK with prohibiting protests at private funerals.

I’ve included it in its entirety below:

It occured to me that somone reading my recent posts defending the “offensive” Muslim cartoons and then reading my post about the inappropriate speech at the King funeral might think that I was being hypocritical.

So I wanted to take the opportunity to explain why I don’t feel those two stances are in conflict:

1.) I believe you should be completely free to say absolutely whatever you want…no matter how offensive someone else might find it.

2.) But I don’t believe you have the right to say it whenever/wherever you want.

There is an appropriate place (and time) for speaking your mind.

Letters to the editor? Good.

Floor of the Senate? Excellent.

Internet: Always the right venue.

Funerals? State of the Union addresses? Oscar speeches? Not so much.

The reason is that while I believe everyone has complete and utter freedom to say what they want…

…other people have an equally inalienable right NOT TO LISTEN!

When you speak in front of a captive audience you are FORCING your speech on someone who can’t respond and can’t escape.

When you intrude on someone’s funeral, viagra usa look party, workplace, home, etc…to speak your piece, you are not leaving room for the other people to avoid your speech if they so choose.

Remember, freedom of speech does NOT mean freedom to force your speech on somebody else.

That’s my opinion…of course, you’re free to ignore it if you wish.

Add comment March 21st, 2006

Two more women have died after taking the “abortion” pill.

According to this article the RU-486 abortion pill may have killed as many as seven women…

…not to mention an untold number of unborn children.

1 comment March 17th, 2006

What’s the French word for “spoiled?”

Tens of thousands of French students are protesting in the streets of Paris.

Not because unemployment among the young is a staggering 23%.

But because a new law aimed at encouraging companies to hire young people also makes it possible for companies to actually fire young people.

Apparently, cialis canada medical under normal circumstances, sovaldi it’s easier to sack a tenured Harvard law professor than it is to layoff a lazy French factory worker.

But this new law makes it less difficult to let someone go in the first two years of their employment.

The idea is that companies wouldn’t be so reluctant to take a chance on a new hire, decease if they knew they wouldn’t be stuck with a bad employee forever.

But these kids would rather riot in the streets than be held responsible at work.

So next time someone here in America talks about “strengthening” our social safety net, remember…

…the stronger the net, the worse you can become entangled in it.

2 comments March 17th, 2006

Guns and cars can both be four-letter words

How many of the people who will call for more gun control after this incident:

CNN.com – Three dead in restaurant shooting

Will call for better car control after this one:

CNN.com – Car veers onto sidewalk, generic cialis pilule kills teacher?

Add comment March 16th, 2006

Gay marriage and the slippery idea of a slippery slope.

Some of the arguments I’ve seen employed in favor of amending the Wisconsin constitution to prohibit gay marriage invoke the concept of the slippery slope.

In other words, viagra drugstore if we allow same-sex marriage, viagra what is to stop us from being forced to accomodate polygamy, etc…

But “slippery slope” is a slippery concept.

For example, most critics of same-sex unions seem to imagine the following marriage “slope:”

0: No marriage at all.
1: Marriage is one man and one woman.
2: Marriage can include two people of the same sex.
3: Marriage can be made up of one man and many woman. (My current favorite.)
4: Marriage can be one woman and many men.
5: Marriage can involve one very sick man and a variety of small, furry forest creatures.

Why is moving from position one to position two any more “slippery” than moving from position zero to position one?

If we can hold steady at position one, why can’t we hold steady at position two?

Plus, who is to say that’s even the right slope?

Maybe it actually goes:

0: No marriage at all – no men married to no women.
1: Same sex marriage – still no men married to no women.
3: Traditional marriage – one man married to one woman.
4: Polygamy – one man married to a bunch of woman.

In that case having one guy being married to one guy and NO women is actually moving away from polygamy.

So, in conclusion, if you’re against polygamy, you should be in favor of gay marriage.

4 comments March 15th, 2006