In what way will reminding me that government programs are rife with fraud encourage me to invite the government into my healthcare?
White House officials say in 2009 more than $54 billion in improper payments were made through Medicare and Medicaid.
March 10th, 2010
…really the moral equivalent of tax evasion, best cialis view abuse of power, view and sexual harassment?
Really?
March 6th, 2010
…if you have the unmitigated gall to suggest that government actually have the money to pay for the things it wants to pay for:
Well before Sen. Jim Bunning retreated from his one-man filibuster on the unemployment-benefits extension bill Tuesday in face of bipartisan scorching, generic viagra and the Kentucky Republican was the target of an uncommon criticism by a colleague from the other chamber — Rep. Jim McDermott.
…
Speaking just before Bunning finally relented, viagra generic McDermott said Bunning’s conduct demanded public scorn. And he dismissed Bunning’s concerns about paying for the extended unemployment benefits, saying that Republicans “had no trouble going to two wars they couldn’t pay for.”
Bunning is “keeping people from getting checks to pay rent and other necessities of life,” McDermott said. “He’s doing it because he can. It’s abuse of power. He should be called out for doing this.”
I can’t remember…what’s that phrase about “two wrongs” again?
March 3rd, 2010
And in the meantime, discount viagra medicine Mr. President, cialis sale could you please address your colleagues in an equal branch of government, by their rightfully earned titles, and not first names? How rude!
March 1st, 2010
…that a kid who is interested in politics thinks someone else should pay for something he wants to do:
A Summer Internship: Who Foots the Bill?
February 15th, 2010
In response to the Supreme Court decision allowing corporations and other organizations to spend money on political commercials, discount cialis cialis Vice President Joe Biden said:
“I think it was dead wrong and we have to correct it, seek ” said Biden, inviting Congress to pass legislation negating the decision.
Of course, it’s not possible for Congress to “pass legislation” that would negate the Courts decision because the only way to “negate” it would be to amend the Constitution and change the First Amendment. A simple bill or law “negating” the decision would fail because it, too, would be overruled by the Constitution…a simple fact I would have hoped the Vice President of the United States would understand.
January 28th, 2010
…to President Obama’s rabid reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision that corporate political speech could not be restricted:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, buy viagra cure or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, viagra or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
January 23rd, 2010
…by explicitly promising to vote against the health care bill isn’t enough to convince Democrats that continuing to try to pass the bill is a bad idea, discount cialis remedy what actually would convince them?
January 20th, 2010