In an attempt to improve school safety in the wake of the Newtown school killings, Homestead High School in Mequon is telling students not to open exterior doors for anyone during school hours.
Because a man with a gun is no match for a glass door.
Do you know what kept me safe? Not some piece of paper. Not a judge tut tutting at him and shaking his/her finger and telling him to leave me alone. Not the police, best cialischeap who, there after all, would only be able to respond once he had caused me harm. No, what kept me safe was my Glock. What kept me safe was my Glock and the fact that he knew I had both the ability and the will to empty a clip into his chest if he made good on his statements that if I did not come back, I would not see the next week. He never tried to do any of the things he screamed he would because he knew that not only would I defend myself but that I could. My Ex was nearly a foot taller than me and, at the time, had about 150 pounds on me. If he had been able to get close enough to me to harm me, there were very few options I had to protect myself. But with my Glock, well, I would be able to stop him before he got that close. I am alive today because he knew that if he tried to make that otherwise, there was a better than even chance he would be the one lying there in a pool of blood instead of me.
Even though there’s absolutely no evidence that limiting gun magazines to 10 rounds would have prevented the shootings in Oak Creek, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is using the occasion to insist that we do just that.
Rather than argue that forcing a shooter to reload more often won’t really slow them down, I’ll just let you see for yourself:
To the people who think an armed civilian would have put a quick end to the massacre: If I had been caught in that theater I would have wanted to be armed, but I’ve got to say it would have been the worst self-defense situation imaginable. Outgunned by a madman in the dark and surrounded by panicking innocents?Firing a handgun at an assailant swaddled in bullet proof/resistant clothing? Blinded by the flash of your own fire? I would have wanted my gun with me, but I’m not sure it would have made much of a difference.
To the people who would use this tragedy to try to implement more “reasonable” gun control laws: The most severe laws we have are reserved for murder and attempted murder. This mad man violated those laws approximate 60 times in just a few minutes. What possible gun-control law can you imagine implementing that he wouldn’t have violated just as blithely? By definition, gun control laws only serve to disarm the law abiding. When you advocate gun control, you are doing your best to make good people helpless in the face of evil. That’s not “reasonable” or compassionate. It’s illogical and cruel.
The person who wrote this used to be a criminal prosecutor:
I am staunchly opposed to concealed carry because, in my opinion, only overly suspicious or dangerous people feel the need to carry concealed guns in the normal course of daily life.
As a prosecutor, I would think she probably saw plenty of cases where the victim hadn’t been suspicious enough.
As a prosecutor, I would think she had plenty of cases where the criminal had been illegally carrying a weapon. The lack of a concealed carry permit hadn’t dissuaded the “dangerous people” from carrying a gun anyhow.
As a citizen, it scares the hell out of me that a former prosecutor feels her personal opinion trumps my Constitutional and natural right to defend myself from the sort of people she used to spend all day putting in jail.
Being in a wheelchair gives you a unique perspective on the world. This blog features many of my views on politics, art, science, and entertainment. My name is Elliot Stearns. More...